. Military Space News .
The Coming War Might Be A Hot One Part Four

Even in Iraq, the lessons of so-called low-intensity conflicts show that heavy armor is necessary to protect supply lines and military convoys and to prevent unduly heavy casualties. Bradley Fighting Vehicles were not up to the job. The new Mine Resistant Ambush Protected Vehicles are vastly better, and the Army and Marines want as many as they can get as fast as they can get them.
by Martin Sieff
Washington (UPI) Sep 22, 2008
The current Bush administration poured vast funds into Pentagon procurement, especially after the terror attacks of Sept. 11, 2001. But then-Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld and his top Department of Defense lieutenants were enamored of high-tech, almost science-fiction wonder schemes that cost the Earth. They did not invest significantly in maintenance budgets for existing equipment or plan adequately to replace equipment that was being worn out far faster than had been anticipated in the ongoing military operations in Iraq.

Underlying all these policies was the comfortable assumption that major land wars between conventional forces were a thing of the past, and that the superiority of U.S. specialized high-tech weapons could take out the armies of major nations, if necessary, the way they disposed of the Iraqi army in both 1991 and 2003.

However, the willingness of the Kremlin last month to use significant ground forces to crush Georgia, a nation that enjoyed the strong support of the United States, suggests these assumptions need to be re-examined as soon as possible.

Previously, critics had claimed the U.S. Army's continued commitment to maintaining a large, state-of-the-art armed force is obsolete in a world of improvised explosive devices and guerrilla war.

There is certainly no doubt that the U.S. armed forces' lack of adequate experience, military doctrine and senior officers grounded in the history of anti-terrorist and guerrilla conflicts cost it heavily in Iraq. It took nearly four years following the invasion and occupation of Iraq in March-April 2003 for Gen. David Petraeus, a top commander with serious expertise in such kinds of war, to be sent out to reshape U.S. tactics, and combat doctrine and conditions have improved remarkably ever since.

But even more than in other militaries, the U.S. tradition always has been to focus obsessively on the lessons to be learned from its most immediate past conflict, and to forget or throw overboard capabilities or experience learned -- usually at a high cost in lives and suffering -- in other wars.

The Clinton administration obsessed for eight years on peacekeeping military models and ignored the grim admonition of Britain's great poet Rudyard Kipling that iron "is master of all." The Bush administration under Rumsfeld for his first six years obsessed about space-based assets, though it willfully ignored the abundant evidence of how vulnerable they were. Defense Secretary Robert Gates is moving as fast as he can to remedy that negligence.

However, the current, long-overdue and so far highly successful focusing on the problems of guerrilla war should not obscure the need to maintain other, more traditional heavy armor and state-of-the-art artillery forces that can be used in more conventional conflicts. Gates and his top Army and Marine Corps officers realize that, which is why they are working hard to maintain the Army's massive heavy tank force in peak condition.

Even in Iraq, the lessons of so-called low-intensity conflicts show that heavy armor is necessary to protect supply lines and military convoys and to prevent unduly heavy casualties. Bradley Fighting Vehicles were not up to the job. The new Mine Resistant Ambush Protected Vehicles are vastly better, and the Army and Marines want as many as they can get as fast as they can get them.

Therefore, even in fighting guerrilla conflicts, there is no alternative to having a large force of state-of-the-art battle tanks and armored personnel carriers. This wisdom is not unique to the U.S. military. It also is shared by the top military planners of Russia, India and China. It would take a very rash person to bet against all of them and claim confidently they are wrong.

Community
Email This Article
Comment On This Article

Share This Article With Planet Earth
del.icio.usdel.icio.us DiggDigg RedditReddit
YahooMyWebYahooMyWeb GoogleGoogle FacebookFacebook



Related Links
Learn about the Superpowers of the 21st Century at SpaceWar.com
Learn about nuclear weapons doctrine and defense at SpaceWar.com



Memory Foam Mattress Review
Newsletters :: SpaceDaily :: SpaceWar :: TerraDaily :: Energy Daily
XML Feeds :: Space News :: Earth News :: War News :: Solar Energy News


Russian warships ready for trip to Venezuela: officials
Moscow (AFP) Sept 22, 2008
Russian warships including a nuclear missile cruiser are ready to leave for joint exercises with Venezuela, Russian naval officials were quoted as saying Sunday by the RIA Novosti news agency.







  • Russian warships ready for trip to Venezuela: officials
  • The Coming War Might Be A Hot One Part Four
  • NATO says may boost defence amid Russian chill
  • The Coming War Might Be A Hot One Part Three

  • 'No indication of nuclear material' in Syria so far: ElBaradei
  • NKorea removes IAEA seal from nuclear facilities: report
  • IAEA urges Iran to come clean on alleged nuke warhead studies
  • NKorea preparing to restart nuclear reactor: official

  • LockMart Wins Contract For Joint Air-To-Ground Missile Program
  • Eurocopter Fires Spike Missile From HAD Tiger
  • NKorea conducts engine tests at new missile site: report
  • US Navy's New Submarine Class Conducts Tomahawk Cruise Missile Launches

  • Raytheon To Develop New Missile Defense Interceptor
  • Czechs, US sign ABM Deal
  • Japan shoots down test missile in US: ministry
  • Outside View: Russia vs. BMD -- Part Two

  • Safer Skies For The Flying Public
  • Chinese airlines fly into headwinds in Olympic year
  • The M2-F1 - An Aircraft Without Wings
  • China's Tianjin building runway for Airbus test flights: report

  • USAF Develops Plan For Filling UAV Operation Jobs
  • Unmanned Aircraft Continue To Prove Worth On Modern Battlefield
  • QinetiQ Rolls Out Field-Transformable Dragon Runner SUGV
  • US drones bring fear and firepower to Qaeda war in Pakistan

  • Baghdad to assume responsibility for "Sons of Iraq": general
  • Dogs of War: WPPS World
  • Analysis: Senators call for Iraqi oil fund
  • US-Iraq security pact facing 'dangerous' obstacles: PM

  • LockMart Provides Perspective On Air Mobility Future
  • US to sell bunker-busting bombs to Israel: Pentagon
  • First Run Of Boeing Laser JDAM Demonstrated On B-52H
  • Boeing Awarded Contract For Radar Upgrade On Saudi AWACS Fleet

  • The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2007 - SpaceDaily.AFP and UPI Wire Stories are copyright Agence France-Presse and United Press International. ESA Portal Reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement,agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by SpaceDaily on any Web page published or hosted by SpaceDaily. Privacy Statement