. | . |
Top US general hails 'very effective' Ukraine defence by AFP Staff Writers Brussels (AFP) March 3, 2022
Top US General Mark Milley on Thursday hailed the "very effective defence" being put up by Ukrainian forces as they battle invading Russian troops. Western officials say Moscow has been surprised by the ferocious resistance being put up by Ukrainian forces and that it has thwarted the Kremlin's plan for a lightning advance. "The Ukrainian military is fighting with extraordinary courage and skill against Russian forced that significantly outnumber them and outgun them," Milley, the chairman of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff, told journalists on a visit to NATO in Brussels. "They are performing extraordinarily well on a very difficult sort of battlefield." The Russian military has admitted that almost 500 of its soldiers have been killed in the week since President Vladimir Putin ordered the invasion. Ukraine claims to have killed around 9,000 Russian troops. Kyiv's forces "are fighting on their own terrain, they know the turf -- a significant advantage of course is that they have the Ukrainian people," Milley said. "The Ukrainian people are the eyes and the ears of the Ukrainian army right now. So they get the best intelligence system in the world, because they have the entire population on their side." Milley was in Brussels at the start of a visit to Europe designed to show Washington's "determination" to defend NATO's eastern flank in the face of Russia's aggression. Allies, spearheaded by the US, have rushed thousands of troops to countries closer to Russia as fighting rages in non-NATO member Ukraine. Milley was set to meet US troops in Germany as the alliance looks to make clear to Moscow that it will trigger NATO's collective defence clause if any member is attacked. "Their mission is critical to the contribution that we are making to NATO, but it's directly related to the US national interests, for NATO to deter any further territorial aggression by Russia against Article Five countries," Milley said. NATO allies are supplying arms to Ukraine to fight the Russian forces, but insist they will not intervene directly in the conflict. They say any use of NATO forces would trigger a direct conflict with Russia that could spiral into nuclear war. That comes in the face of persistent calls from some quarters for the alliance to try to impose a no-fly zone over Ukraine to stop Moscow's bombing. "We're not part of the conflict, we will not be part of the conflict," NATO chief Jens Stoltenberg said Wednesday at a meeting with Iceland's prime minister. "NATO will not be on the ground with forces or soldiers in Ukraine and will not be in the airspace of Ukraine." The Russian military's initial invasion of Ukraine has been a surprising strategic and tactical blunder marked by food and fuel shortages, abandoned armored vehicles, aircraft losses and troop deaths, US experts say. But the failures of the first days, including vastly underestimating the Ukrainians' willingness to fight back, could lead to a frustrated Moscow deciding to unleash all its power and indiscriminately destroying large swathes of Ukraine, they said. US specialists who study the Russian military say they have been astonished by the mismanagement of the campaign, which has seen invading columns stalled, apparently hundreds of Russian armored vehicles lost, and the Ukrainians preventing the Kremlin's air force from controlling the skies. "If you were going to screw it up two or three weeks in, I might understand it," said Scott Boston, a senior defense analyst at the Rand Corp. think tank. "But if you, like, tripped over the doorframe on the way into the house, you have another issue," he said. - 'Disaster, through and through' - The Pentagon and private sector experts expected Russian President Vladimir Putin's army to quickly destroy Ukraine's ability to fight back, undermining its command and control of the 200,000-strong Ukraine military, wrecking its missile defenses and destroying Kyiv's air force. None of that has happened in the first six days. And, although there are no reliable estimates of the dead, injured and captured Russian troops, the numbers appear to be much higher than what would have been expected in a well-managed invasion. "This is a colossal intelligence failure that vastly underestimated Ukrainian resistance, and military execution has been terrible," Michael Vickers, former US Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence, said this week at the Center for Strategic and International Studies. "His main attack has been underweighted. It's been piecemeal. His reconnaissance elements have been captured, columns have been destroyed," he said. "It's just a disaster, through and through." - Aircraft losses - An assessment by military experts of the Atlantic Council's Scowcroft Center pointed to the crucial failure of the Russians to quickly seize and hold an airport just outside Kyiv. The fight over the airport left it likely too damaged to use as planned to invade Kyiv, they said. Moreover, they said, "Russian aircraft and helicopter losses have been surprisingly high and unsustainable," because they did not destroy the Ukrainians' air defenses. Also surprising was the limited or ineffective deployment of electronic warfare weapons, which most analysts expected would have a significant role in attacking the Ukrainians' ability to communicate. "Were the Russians able to cut off Ukrainian military leaders from those they are commanding ... Ukrainian air and air-defense forces would have been forced to fight in an uncoordinated fashion, making them less lethal and more susceptible to attack," the Scowcroft Center report said. Boston pointed out that the Ukrainians have continued to use their Turkish-made Bayraktar drones to destroy Russian armor. "If they got hit with the Turkish drones once or twice, okay," he said. "If they got hit more than once or twice, something's wrong on the Russian side." - Food shortages - Pentagon spokesman John Kirby said that the Russians appeared to not coordinate well their sizable and diverse capabilities, or manage the logistics for the invasion. "We're seeing indications here early on that though they have sophisticated combined arms capabilities, that they're not being necessarily fully integrated," he said. Equally surprising was their logistics shortcomings. "We're seeing vehicles abandoned. We're seeing sustainment problems not just in fuel but in food," he said Wednesday. Boston, who has taken part in high-level war games focused on the Russian force, said there are signs they much of the force is young, undertrained for this kind of conflict, and probably unaware they were even going to war. He said it appeared, too, that the troops on the ground had no sense of what they were trying to do in invading Ukraine, with its longstanding ties to Russia. "If you don't know what's going on ... you can't adapt," he said. None of the experts count the Russians out. The Russian force's advance has stalled, but that could allow it to resolve its logistical problems, noted Kirby. And to the contrary, they expect Putin's frustration over the first days could lead to his unleashing the full force of his artillery, missiles and air power on the Ukrainian population with devastating effect. "Russia still holds the overwhelming combat power advantages that will eventually grind down Ukrainian forces as the war continues," said the Scowcroft Center analysis.
Russian invasion of Ukraine upends international relations Washington (AFP) March 2, 2022 Russia's war against Ukraine is a week old, but its consequences are already reverberating across the globe: it has upended international relations, left Moscow isolated, united a previously divided West, and raised the specter of a nuclear standoff. - Russia, a 'pariah' state - Moscow's offensive marks a turning point for the whole world. Above all, Russia's attack shattered "the hope that post-Cold War Europe would be spared a large-scale land war," said Ali Wyne, Senior Analyst with Euras ... read more
|
|
The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2024 - Space Media Network. All websites are published in Australia and are solely subject to Australian law and governed by Fair Use principals for news reporting and research purposes. AFP, UPI and IANS news wire stories are copyright Agence France-Presse, United Press International and Indo-Asia News Service. ESA news reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. All articles labeled "by Staff Writers" include reports supplied to Space Media Network by industry news wires, PR agencies, corporate press officers and the like. Such articles are individually curated and edited by Space Media Network staff on the basis of the report's information value to our industry and professional readership. Advertising does not imply endorsement, agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by Space Media Network on any Web page published or hosted by Space Media Network. General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) Statement Our advertisers use various cookies and the like to deliver the best ad banner available at one time. All network advertising suppliers have GDPR policies (Legitimate Interest) that conform with EU regulations for data collection. By using our websites you consent to cookie based advertising. If you do not agree with this then you must stop using the websites from May 25, 2018. Privacy Statement. Additional information can be found here at About Us. |