. Military Space News .
Truth was first US casualty in Iraq war: study

White House rejects charges of misleading ahead of Iraq war
The White House on Wednesday angrily denounced a study charging that President George W. Bush and other senior US officials paved the way for war in Iraq with a campaign of false claims. "I hardly think that the study is worth spending time on," spokeswoman Dana Perino said of the Center for Public Integrity's assessment that Bush and top aides made 935 false charges ahead of the March 2003 invasion. The spokeswoman charged that the study ignored statements by US lawmakers or "people around the world" reflecting what she described as a consensus that Iraq possessed weapons of mass destruction (WMDs). "As you'll remember, we were part of a broad coalition of countries that deposed the dictator based on a collective understanding of the intelligence," said Perino. "The other thing that that study fails to do is to say that after realizing that there was no WMD, as we thought as a collective body that there was, that this White House, the president set about to make reforms in the intelligence community to make sure that it doesn't happen again," she said. The study charged that Bush and other major US government figures like then defense secretary Donald Rumsfeld and secretary of state Colin Powell leveled categorical accusations that outstripped US intelligence about Saddam Hussein's regime.
by Staff Writers
Washington (AFP) Jan 23, 2008
US President George W. Bush and his top officials ran roughshod over the truth in the run-up to the Iraq war lying a total of 935 times, a study released Wednesday found.

Bush and his administration "waged a carefully orchestrated campaign of misinformation about the threat posed by Saddam Hussein's Iraq," said the damning report entitled "False Pretenses."

According to the Center for Public Integrity, eight administration officials "made at least 935 false statements" about Iraq's possession of weapons of mass destruction, or links to Al-Qaeda, on 532 separate occasions.

"In short, the Bush administration led the nation to war on the basis of erroneous information that it methodically propagated and that culminated in military action against Iraq on March 19, 2003."

But the White House reacted angrily to the study saying it ignored statements by US lawmakers or "people around the world" reflecting what it said was a consensus that Iraq possessed weapons of mass destruction.

"I hardly think that the study is worth spending time on," spokeswoman Dana Perino said. "As you'll remember, we were part of a broad coalition of countries that deposed the dictator based on a collective understanding of the intelligence."

The center alleged however that the administration's march to war began on September 11, 2001 in the wake of the attacks on the World Trade Center.

Over the months and as Congress was set to vote to approve the war in August 2002, the number of false statements dramatically increased.

The campaign reached a pitch in early 2003 with Bush's State of the Union address and when then secretary of state Colin Powell took the US case for war to the UN Security Council.

"The cumulative effect of these false statements amplified by thousands of news stories and broadcasts was massive, with the media coverage creating an almost impenetrable din for several critical months in the run-up to war," the study said.

Charges that Saddam had stockpiled an arsenal of weapons of mass destruction were the main argument used in parliaments around the world and in the United Nations to justify the US-led invasion.

But after the invasion they turned out to be untrue, when no weapons of mass destruction were found.

The study research raises question marks over "the repeated assertions of Bush administration officials that they were merely the unwitting victims of bad intelligence," the center added in the report.

The US president was found to have made the most false statements referring a total of 260 times to Iraq's supposed weapons of mass destruction and Al-Qaeda's alleged links to the Baghdad regime.

But then-secretary of state Powell only just lagged behind with 254 false communications, said the study by the center's founder Charles Lewis and researchers.

Vice President Dick Cheney, former national security advisor Condoleezza Rice, then defense secretary Donald Rumsfeld, and ex-deputy defense secretary Paul Wolfowitz were also fingered in the study, along with former White House press secretaries Ari Fleisher and Scott McClellan.

Cheney, for example, on August 26, 2002, in an address to the Veterans of Foreign Wars national convention, asserted: "Simply stated, there is no doubt that Saddam Hussein now has weapons of mass destruction.

"There is no doubt he is amassing them to use against our friends, against our allies, and against us."

Former CIA chief George Tenet later noted Cheney's assertions exceeded his agency's assessments at the time, the report said.

In late September 2002, Bush insisted in a radio address that the Baghdad regime posed a global threat.

"The Iraqi regime possesses biological and chemical weapons, is rebuilding the facilities to make more and, according to the British government, could launch a biological or chemical attack in as little as 45 minutes after the order is given," Bush said.

"This regime is seeking a nuclear bomb, and with fissile material could build one within a year."

Community
Email This Article
Comment On This Article

Related Links
Iraq: The first technology war of the 21st century



Memory Foam Mattress Review
Newsletters :: SpaceDaily :: SpaceWar :: TerraDaily :: Energy Daily
XML Feeds :: Space News :: Earth News :: War News :: Solar Energy News


Pentagon confident in armored vehicles despite first fatality
Washington (AFP) Jan 22, 2008
The Pentagon said Tuesday it was more confident than ever in the MRAP armored vehicle, even after a soldier's death in Iraq showed for the first time that they are vulnerable to roadside bombs.







  • Walker's World: China or Russia?
  • US concerned over China military build-up, Taiwan: admiral
  • Taiwan condemns China's 'chequebook diplomacy' over Malawi ties
  • India and China pledge new era of cooperation

  • UN chief urges progress in stalled global disarmament talks
  • Too soon to take NKorea off terror list: US
  • Iran brushes off new sanctions threat
  • US denies NKorean charges on denuclearization

  • NATO Could Use US Missiles For South East Theater Defense
  • Analysis: Capabilities of Chinese missiles
  • Israel test-fires ballistic missile after Iran warning
  • MEADS Receives Contract To Incorporate New PAC-3 Missile Segment Enhancement

  • ABM Turnaround In Seoul With SM-3s For Sejong The Great
  • Olmert briefed on Israeli missile shield progress
  • US hopeful of agreement soon with Czechs on radar
  • Seoul to equip ships to intercept NKorea missiles: report

  • Qatar Airways looking to natural gas fuel
  • EADS offers to build military, civilian aircraft in US
  • Purdue Wind Tunnel Key For Hypersonic Vehicles And Future Space Planes
  • Antarctic ballooning hits milestone

  • Iraq War See Widespread Use Of Unmanned Air Vehicles
  • BAE Systems Delivers UAV Target Detection Systems To US Army
  • Unmanned Aerial Vehicles Show Battlefield To Soldiers
  • GA-ASI And SENER Sign Teaming Agreement On Predator UAS Series

  • Truth was first US casualty in Iraq war: study
  • Pentagon confident in armored vehicles despite first fatality
  • US says warplanes pound Al-Qaeda in Iraq targets
  • Analysis: U.S. puts Kurds on terror list

  • Raytheon To Provide Revolutionary AESA Capabilities To 135 F/A-18s
  • Boeing Completes Flight Of First AEW And C Wedgetail Aircraft Modified In Australia
  • Rheinmetall To Supply Kodiak Armoured Engineer Vehicles To Sweden And The Netherlands
  • Lockheed Martin's F-22 Raptor Inducted Into National Museum Of The USAF

  • The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2007 - SpaceDaily.AFP and UPI Wire Stories are copyright Agence France-Presse and United Press International. ESA Portal Reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement,agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by SpaceDaily on any Web page published or hosted by SpaceDaily. Privacy Statement