![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
. | ![]() |
. |
![]()
United Nations (AFP) Dec 14, 2010 The UN Security Council will on Wednesday end a swathe of Saddam Hussein-era sanctions against Iraq in a sign of the changes in the country, diplomats said. US Vice President Joe Biden will chair a Security Council meeting that will lift the international penalties mainly dating from Saddam's 1990 invasion of neighboring Kuwait that set off the first Gulf War. While international worries persist over attacks on Iraq's Christians and other minorities, and no definitive post-war agreement has been reached with Kuwait, US ambassador to the United Nations, Susan Rice, said it is time for international recognition of the "very real progress" made in Iraq. Before the US-led invasion in 2003, Iraq was the target of the toughest sanctions regime in UN history with a near total trade and financial embargo. One resolution to be passed on Wednesday would lift sanctions imposed in 1991 to stop Iraq building the feared nuclear, chemical and biological weapons that were never found after 2003. A second resolution would end the oil-for-food program which allowed Saddam to use billions of dollars of oil money to buy food and medicine between 1996 and 2003. A third resolution would extend UN protection for six months for hundreds of millions of dollars in the Development Fund for Iraq (DFI) which was set up after the 2003 war to handle oil and other revenues. The UN Security Council passed the original resolutions under Chapter VII of the UN Charter which was used to authorize sanctions and the international military operation to liberate Kuwait in 1991. Wednesday's meeting will be "an important opportunity for the international community to recognize the very real progress that Iraq has made, both in terms of government formation, as well as the significant steps that have been taken to terminate its Chapter VII obligations," said Rice when she presented the Security Council program earlier this month. The United States holds the Security Council presidency for December. But a diplomat from another of the 14 nations on the council said all were agreed that steps had to be taken to re-establish full Iraqi sovereignty over its affairs. Iraq informed the Security Council in July of measures it has taken to show its commitment to disarmament, including its intention to sign an International Atomic Energy Agency protocol allowing for extra international checks on its facilities. The Security Council has called on Iraq to ratify the protocol as soon as possible, and some council members wanted this reaffirmed in the resolution to be passed Wednesday. Iraq had wanted an extra year of UN protection for the DFI against creditors. The United States and Britain wanted the fund to come to an end on December 31, but agreed to a six month extension because of the recent political crisis in Iraq. There will still be sanctions against some minor members of the Saddam regime who are still on the run. Iraq is also required to pay five percent of its oil revenues into a UN fund for reparations for Kuwait. More than 30 billion dollars has already been paid out by the fund, and Iraq has protested that the measure is too severe and should be lifted. Kuwait has countered that before being released from the sanctions, Iraq needs to agree the border between the two countries, and pay a further 22 billion dollars due in war reparations. The United States called for top ministers to attend Wednesday's meeting. Turkey's Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoglu is expected to be present, and Britain will be represented by Foreign Office under secretary of state Alistair Burt.
earlier related report "Security is essential to economic and business development," said Ethan B. Kapstein, a professor of international affairs at the University of Texas' Lyndon B. Johnson School of Public Affairs, in an e-mailed message. Investors are reluctant to make capital investments in conflict areas, Kapstein said, fearing that they will be destroyed. The reluctance affects not only foreign investment but local entrepreneurs, research indicates. And that lack of investment exacerbates the difficulty of creating security in a country, experts said. Gayle Tzemach Lemmon, a journalist and fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations who researched women-owned businesses in post-war areas, said economic growth is key in creating secure communities. "Entrepreneurs are a passionate and vocal force for stability," she said. Afghanistan Despite low inflation and impressive economic growth, Afghanistan remains a challenging environment for many businesses and not only because it is a conflict zone. Foreign firms and exporters are few but the U.S. State Department's Bureau of Economic, Energy and Business Affairs says the investment climate "has shown surprising levels of dynamism in recent years." A World Bank report indicates Afghanistan's gross domestic product is expected to grow 8.6 percent in 2010-11 due mainly to a boom in agriculture, mining and the service sector. Low inflation -- estimated this year at around 5 percent -- has started to make inroads into the country's high poverty levels. But despite the encouraging signs, security is still a top concern for most entrepreneurs, said Sulaiman Lutfi, chairman of the board of the Afghan-American Chamber of Commerce, an organization created eight years ago to promote private investments in Afghanistan through seminars and networking events. In addition, uncertainty is one of the main concerns of local business owners, said Jake Cusack, a graduate student at Harvard University's Kennedy and Business schools. Cusack, who recently co-wrote a policy brief for the Center for a New American Security interviewed 130 business owners in Afghanistan and found that their top concerns weren't about security. Despite Kandahar's reputation for being one of the most dangerous cities in the country, for example, Cusack and study co-author Erik Malmstrom determined that business people there were mainly worried about unstable power supplies, financing and the intentions of the local and national government. The U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan, Cusack said, was often mentioned as another source of uncertainty. Inadequate infrastructure, complex regulations and government corruption also contribute to making Afghanistan an unfriendly place for investors. Corruption is endemic in the country, including in the judicial system; in 2009, Afghanistan ranked 179 out of 180 countries in Transparency International's survey on global corruption. According to the State Department, most businesses rely on "informal mechanisms" to resolve legal disputes and enforce property rights and many report often being asked for bribes in exchange for a government service. "Despite an incredibly difficult business environment, a lot of entrepreneurs are working around the obstacles doing the best that they can because they see their businesses as a way to support their families," Lemmon said. Iraq Roadblocks to investment in Iraq are similar to those in Afghanistan. "Everything imaginable needs to be rebuilt," said Leslie M. Schweitzer, senior trade adviser for the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, referring to airports, seaports, waterways, railroads, water purification systems and around 2 million to 3 million houses. "The numbers are astronomic." The 2011 World Bank's "Doing Business" report ranked Iraq 166th out of 183 countries. Despite its abundant natural resources, Iraq's GDP is very volatile, mainly because of its dependence on oil, a sector marked by extreme price fluctuations. While security has improved, widespread corruption, a fragile rule of law and complex regulations still make business owners' lives difficult. Nevertheless, Iraq holds "tremendous opportunities" for investors, Schweitzer said. "The U.S. Chamber of Commerce is taking a very aggressive approach in helping American companies to take advantage of the billions of dollars of infrastructure needs in Iraq," she said. In 2008, the chamber created the Iraq Business Initiative with the goal of facilitating U.S. investment in the country. While the oil and gas sectors have attracted large companies, Schweitzer said that American businesses haven't taken advantage of the services related to them. "We have realized that Turkish, Chinese, French, German and Indian companies are doing much more business there than American companies," Schweitzer said. The infrastructure and the energy sector, she said, also offer increasing opportunities. While Schweitzer acknowledged that doing business in Iraq isn't for everybody, she said it is worth it for companies to explore what the country has to offer. "It's very important, since America paid the highest price to get this country to the point of being a democracy," she said.
Share This Article With Planet Earth
Related Links Iraq: The first technology war of the 21st century
![]() ![]() Karbala, Iraq (AFP) Dec 14, 2010 Iraqi forces will provide security for Ashura ceremonies this week in Karbala with no active support from US forces, in a key test of their capabilities ahead of an American pullout in a year. Heavy security is being deployed in the Shiite Muslim shrine city for Ashura, which marks the slaying of the revered Imam Hussein by the armies of the caliph Yazid in 680. It has in previous years ... read more |
![]() |
|
The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2010 - SpaceDaily. AFP and UPI Wire Stories are copyright Agence France-Presse and United Press International. ESA Portal Reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement,agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by SpaceDaily on any Web page published or hosted by SpaceDaily. Privacy Statement |