. | . |
US, Iraq, Iran and Israel Need To Talk Not Meddle
Baghdad (AFP) Nov 18, 2008 Senior US and Iraqi officials differed on Tehran's role in stalling a military accord that will allow US troops to remain in Iraq until 2011, as Iran on Tuesday sent mixed signals on the deal. The Iraqi cabinet approved the agreement on Sunday and parliament was expected on November 24 to take a vote on the wide-ranging pact, which would replace the troops' UN mandate when it expires on December 31. After months of wrangling, the agreement was eventually accepted by all the major political blocs representing Iraq's Shiite majority and its Sunni and Kurdish communities. But two senior US officials involved in the protracted negotiations leading up to the deal insisted on Monday that mostly Shiite Iran had done everything it could to pressure Iraqi leaders into refusing the agreement. "There has been absolutely no softening in the position of the government of Iran. They are dead-set against the success of this agreement," one of the officials said on condition of anonymity. "They have, to our knowledge and the knowledge of every Iraqi official involved in this, maintained unrelenting pressure." Despite the vast improvement in security in Iraq over the past year US officials insist Iran is still funding, arming and training proxy militias in the country, charges denied by Tehran. "Iran strategically wants to be the dominant actor in this country in every sphere, economics, political, security," another senior US official in Baghdad said. "They have pulled out every stop to block this agreement." Iraqi government spokesman Ali al-Dabbagh, however, said he felt the Iranians had "become less offensive on this agreement" because of Iraqi assurances that its territory would not be used for attacks on its neighbours. "I think that (the Iranians) are looking to have a better policy with the US. We are encouraging even the US to review their policy toward Iran," Dabbagh told AFP at his residence in Baghdad's heavily-guarded Green Zone on Monday. "We are the big loser in the conflict between the United States and Iran. At the end Iraq is a battlefield," he added. In a televised address later on Tuesday Maliki sought to reassure both Iran and Syria, who have said the pact legitimises the US occupation. "There will be no permanent (US) bases in Iraq and our country will not be used as a corridor or as a base to attack another state," Maliki said. Tehran has yet to officially respond to the Iraqi cabinet's approval, but in the Islamic republic reactions were mixed. Parliament speaker Ali Larijani urged the Iraqi parliament to resist the pact which he said strengthens "US hegemony in Iraq," in statements carried overnight by the official IRNA news agency. "With this so-called security pact, they were after turning Iraq into another US state but the Iraqi sources of jurisprudence, government and nation resisted for eight months," Larijani said, referring to the lengthy talks. "The Iraqi nation and parliament should realise that the time for resistance is not over yet," he added. But the head of Iran's judiciary, Ayatollah Mahmoud Hashemi Shahrudi, said Iraq had "performed well" with regard to the pact and expressed his hope that US troops would depart according to its timetable. Last month Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said the agreement seeks to keep Iraq weak to help America "pillage" the country. But a week after he made his remarks the US military again accused Iran of stoking violence in Iraq, saying it had arrested 39 Iranian-funded "criminals" and seized half a million dollars bound for militias. Iran, which fought a bloody war with Iraq from 1980-1988, has denied such charges, saying it is committed to stability in the country. Share This Article With Planet Earth
Related Links Iraq: The first technology war of the 21st century
US-Iraq Pact Highlights Year Of Ongoing Gains Washington (AFP) Nov 17, 2008 Washington and Baghdad are moving closer to clinching a security pact that highlights Iraq's growing stability but also the blood and treasure that all sides have spent to achieve modest gains. |
|
The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2007 - SpaceDaily.AFP and UPI Wire Stories are copyright Agence France-Presse and United Press International. ESA Portal Reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement,agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by SpaceDaily on any Web page published or hosted by SpaceDaily. Privacy Statement |