![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
. | ![]() |
. |
![]()
Washington (AFP) Jun 12, 2006 The United States said Friday it would revise laws to facilitate export of sensitive high-technology equipment to China under a new policy designed to prevent such products from being used for military purposes. The new policy will spare the need for US exporters in critical sectors such as semiconductor equipment and electronics to apply for licenses for sales to companies in China. It will also ensure closer scrutiny of key technology purchasers in China, a senior US Department of Commerce official said. The changes to Washington's so-called China Export Control Policy will achieve "growth in civilian high-tech trade and enhanced security," undersecretary of commerce for industry and security David McCormick said. "These changes to technology export controls for China are a 'win-win'", he told a forum of the Washington-based Center for Strategic and International Studies. McCormick said Washington would urge other nations, particularly in Europe and Japan, to take similar steps. But he stressed that Chinese companies must demonstrate an established record of nonproliferation and "responsible civilian use" of US high-tech products if they wanted to be importers under the new policy. "This process will require unprecedented openness and cooperation on the part of Chinese companies. And it will create incentives for them to demonstrate good faith and sound practices. "In addition, it will allow US government officials to focus on more complex cases with more severe implications for American security," he said. The new policy, McCormick emphasized, would prevent exports of technologies for incorporation into Chinese weapons systems. For example, he said, US policy should facilitate sales of American-made semiconductors to companies in China for use in stereos or a childs Game Boy, but not for advanced missile systems or submarines. Similarly, the cutting edge composite technology that helps China build commercial aircraft must not also find its way into the Super-7 next generation fighter aircraft, he said. The United States has been worried that China would use imported sensitive high-technology products in its rapidly expanding military modernization program, being implemented under a defense budget with little transparency. A recent study by the RAND corporation, a US non-profit institution, said China wanted to strengthen its military capabilities by acquiring advanced, dual-use technologies and incorporating them into defense systems, noting that Beijing's military budget has risen faster than its overall economy. US high-tech exports to China last year reached more than 12 billion dollars and the new licensing flexibility would further open up "potentially hundreds of millions of dollars" worth of American sales to Chinese companies, McCormick said. McCormick said the United States would not use a wide-ranging "catch-all regulation" under the new policy to prevent exports of technologies for incorporation into Chinese weapons systems. It will not subject "everything from fountain pens to office furniture" to government scrutiny. "Rather, these changes carefully target certain technologies that, while unrestricted until now, have the potential to materially enhance Chinas military capabilities," he said. "And we will continue to conduct on-the-ground spot checks in China to reduce the risk that civilian exports are diverted to third parties or to Chinas own military purposes."
Source: Agence France-Presse
Related Links ![]() US Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld urged China Saturday to explain its increased military spending to the world, saying it was in its interest to demystify actions that others find potentially threatening. |
![]() |
|
The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2006 - SpaceDaily.AFP and UPI Wire Stories are copyright Agence France-Presse and United Press International. ESA PortalReports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additionalcopyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement,agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by SpaceDaily on any Web page published or hosted by SpaceDaily. Privacy Statement |