. Military Space News .
US Wants To Go It Alone On Missile Defense

The current system might lead to another U.S. technological breakthrough, and that is the main stumbling block in the dialogue between Moscow and Washington concerning the creation of a virtually joint European missile defense system. Instead of divulging its secrets to Russia, the United States would promise to share them with Moscow only after the missile defense system becomes operational.
by Pyotr Goncharov
Moscow (RIA Novosti) Jun 29, 2007
Russian President Vladimir Putin is set to join President George W. Bush at Walker's Point, the Bush family's seaside estate, in Kennebunkport, Maine, this weekend for a short summer retreat. Both leaders will focus on the deployment of elements of a U.S. missile defense system, namely 10 missile interceptors in Poland and an early-warning radar in the Czech Republic.

President Putin, meanwhile, has proposed that Russia and the United States use the Moscow-controlled Gabala early-warning radar in Azerbaijan as an alternative to the European missile defense system. However, both the Pentagon and the U.S. State Department are skeptical about the Russian initiative. And the ball is now in President Bush's court.

General of the Army Yury Baluyevsky, chief of the Russian Armed Forces' General Staff, said President Bush's reply to Moscow's proposal would reveal the United States' real goals concerning the deployment of its European missile defense system.

The Russian General Staff does not think that Washington will accept President Putin's proposal on the joint use of the Gabala radar. General Baluyevsky said the Bush administration had already decided to deploy missile defenses in Eastern Europe, and that the Russian initiative would not meet with a positive response.

Although the Gabala radar is not compatible with U.S. missile interceptors, Moscow says it could upgrade the installation, if necessary. However, the United States is not ready to accept President Putin's proposal because it would change the very essence of the missile defense system and would turn it into an international strategic instrument.

When interviewed by journalists about the European missile defense system's real capabilities, General Baluyevsky said U.S. companies viewed it as commercially attractive. He said that although the tremendous investment would not make the system completely reliable, there would be some technological spin-offs, as was the case with the seemingly adventurist Strategic Defense Initiative (SDI), proposed by U.S. President Ronald Reagan in 1983.

The current system might lead to another U.S. technological breakthrough, and that is the main stumbling block in the dialogue between Moscow and Washington concerning the creation of a virtually joint European missile defense system.

Instead of divulging its secrets to Russia, the United States would promise to share them with Moscow only after the missile defense system becomes operational. In fact, President Reagan had promised to do the same. The White House hopes that current and future technological breakthroughs would make it possible to create a reliable system for shielding the United States and its allies.

Although the Bush administration claims the system is designed for defense against countries with unstable and unpredictable regimes, such as North Korea and Iran, this broad interpretation may apply to some other states.

Because predictable political regimes may sometimes become unpredictable, Washington can therefore justify its decision to deploy permanent missile defense systems in Europe, Asia or anywhere else.

The Gabala radar simply does not conform to the Americans' logic, and the Russian General Staff's claims that no country, however powerful, can independently solve the problem of security has been called into question. Although Washington says it agrees with this statement, it does not want to scrap plans for a European missile defense shield.

U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice said the Russian proposal was worth examining, but that the United States would continue doing what it deemed best for its security. She said Washington would not ask anyone's advice because "geometry and geography," not national interests, determine how you intercept a missile.

The Russian General Staff said that Moscow was ready to respond to any threat to its national interests using political, diplomatic or military methods.

NATO Secretary General Jaap de Hoop Scheffer said during his visit to Moscow that Putin's initiative did not just call for the joint use of the Gabala radar. Scheffer did not elaborate, merely reminding journalists about the upcoming Russian-U.S. summit in Maine.

The opinions expressed in this article are the author's and do not necessarily represent those of RIA Novosti.

Source: RIA Novosti

Community
Email This Article
Comment On This Article

Related Links
Learn about missile defense at SpaceWar.com
Learn about nuclear weapons doctrine and defense at SpaceWar.com
All about missiles at SpaceWar.com
Learn about the Superpowers of the 21st Century at SpaceWar.com



Memory Foam Mattress Review
Newsletters :: SpaceDaily :: SpaceWar :: TerraDaily :: Energy Daily
XML Feeds :: Space News :: Earth News :: War News :: Solar Energy News


Poland Sees US Missile Shield Deal By October; As Russia Beefs Up Kyrgyzstan Base
Warsaw (AFP) June 27, 2007
Poland and United States could reach a deal by September or October on installing part of the US anti-missile defence system in the central European country, local media reported Wednesday citing a top foreign ministry official. Deputy foreign minister Witold Waszczykowski, who just completed a round of negotiations with the Americans, told Polish journalists in Washington that Warsaw was "satisfied" that US officials had accepted several of Poland's demands.







  • Russia Warns NATO Over European Security As Topol Nuke Production Ramps Up
  • US Ready To Work On New Treaty To Replace START Treaty
  • The Recovery Of Europe Driven By Surging Economy
  • Former Cold War Foes Fail To Agree On Arms Treaty Review

  • UN Nuclear Inspectors End Fruitful Visit To North Korea
  • Iran Vows To Press On With Nuclear Work
  • Russia Puts Cosmos Military Satellite In Orbit
  • Russia Test Launches Sea-Based Ballistic Missile

  • Lockheed Martin Receives 18 Million USD For Low Cost Reduced-Range GMLRS Practice Rockets
  • North Korea Tests New Missiles As Inspectors Head To Nuclear Reactor
  • General Dynamics To Demonstrate Ground-Based Counter-MANPADS Aircraft-Protection Technology
  • Kalam Asks BrahMos Developers To Work On Mark-II Version

  • Japan PM Seeking Leeway To Shoot Down Missile For US
  • US Wants To Go It Alone On Missile Defense
  • Poland Sees US Missile Shield Deal By October; As Russia Beefs Up Kyrgyzstan Base
  • Raytheon Ships Second Terminal High Altitude Area Defense Radar To Missile Defense Agency

  • Europe Bans All Indonesian Airlines From EU Airspace
  • Too Little Scope For Development Of Current Aircraft Technology
  • France Supports Cap On Airline Carbon Emissions
  • F-35 Lightning 2 Pushing Ahead On All Fronts

  • Puma Small UAS Achieves Record Flight Time Using Fuel Cell Battery Hybrid System
  • Predators Reach Quarter-Million Flight Hours
  • Boeing Demonstrates Autonomous Command And Control Of Multiple UAVs
  • Northrop Grumman Hunter Clocks Up 50000 Hours Flight Time

  • Senate Will Not Sway Bush On Iraq
  • The Iraqi Refugee Disaster
  • Grim June For US Casualties In Iraq
  • Stress Hits US Workers In Iraq

  • Raytheon Wins Whole-Life Support Contract For Rapid Aerostat Initial Deployment Systems
  • Sandia Supports Development Of New US Army Cannon System
  • NGC Lab To Develope Prototype For Integrated Air and Missile Defense Battle Command System
  • Raytheon-Led Warrior Training Alliance Wins US Army Warfighter FOCUS Program

  • The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2006 - SpaceDaily.AFP and UPI Wire Stories are copyright Agence France-Presse and United Press International. ESA PortalReports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additionalcopyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement,agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by SpaceDaily on any Web page published or hosted by SpaceDaily. Privacy Statement