The split verdict marked a dramatic conclusion of the first trial before the special tribunals created by President George W. Bush to try suspects in the "war on terror."

The jury must now set a sentence for Hamdan, who faces a possible maximum term of life in prison.

His case, the first US war crimes trial since World War II, was seen as an important test of the controversial military commission system that has been widely criticized by human rights groups as unfair.

The White House welcomed the verdict shortly after it was announced and the Pentagon said it intended to press forward with the trials of at least 20 more detainees at Guantanamo Bay.

"We're pleased that Salim Hamdan received a fair trial," White House spokesman Tony Fratto said. "The Military Commission system is a fair and appropriate legal process ... We look forward to other cases moving forward to trial."

"We respect that decision," Bryan Whitman, a Pentagon spokesman, said of the verdict. "We fully intend to move forward with additional prosecutions on the 20 other cases that are currently in the military commission system."

Clad in a white turban and tan coat, Hamdan stood with a solemn expression and then bowed his head as the verdict was read out by the head of the jury in a makeshift courtroom at the remote US naval base in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.

The Yemeni national with a fourth-grade education has been at the center of intense legal battles in which the Bush administration has fought to prosecute terror suspects outside regular courts and to hold others indefinitely without charge.

Hamdan was found guilty of five counts under the single charge of support for terrorism, alleging he served as a driver and bodyguard for bin Laden, ferried weapons for Al-Qaeda and was fully aware that the organization engaged in terrorism.

But the rejection of the conspiracy charge showed prosecutors were unable to prove that Hamdan helped plot and plan Al-Qaeda attacks on civilians or other targets.

"This military commission finds you on charge number one (conspiracy) not guilty ... of charge two (material support for terrorism), guilty," announced the head of the jury, a Navy officer whose identity was withheld.

Defense lawyers said they would appeal the verdict after questioning whether Hamdan's role as a driver qualifies as a war crime. They also allege dubious evidence was presented in the case from coercive interrogations.

"Is material support a war crime? The defense believes it is not," one of Hamdan's lawyers, Michael Berrigan, told reporters after the verdict. "That issue will go forward on appeal."

Berrigan said it was a "travesty" that Hamdan was convicted under a law adopted in 2006, which established the military commissions, long after he was captured in 2001 in Afghanistan.

But a legal expert and former prosecutor, Jonathan Drimmer, said it was "a good outcome for the government in arguing that this was a fair trial."

The case indicated the jury was independent, was able to weigh the evidence and to make a decision based on evidence, "three of the critical hallmarks of a fair trial," said Drimmer, a law professor at Georgetown University.

"The fourth factor, the ability of the defense to mount a full defense, is where the criticism of the process likely will be levied," he said, citing hearsay and secret evidence.

During two weeks of proceedings, prosecutors described Hamdan as among an inner circle of bin Laden's henchmen.

But the defense argued that although he was bin Laden's driver, Hamdan was a minor figure without a role in terrorist plots. His lawyers invoked the Nuremberg trials, saying Adolf Hitler's driver was never prosecuted for war crimes.

New York-based Human Rights Watch (HRW) slammed the proceedings as marred by irregularities favoring the prosecution, making it all but impossible for Hamdan to get a fair hearing.

"The verdict was in long before the jury began to deliberate," said HRW's Carol Chodroff.

The military commissions have faced repeated legal challenges and Hamdan's appeal could have far-reaching consequences.

Community
Email This Article
Comment On This Article

Share This Article With Planet Earth

del.icio.us	Digg	Reddit
YahooMyWeb	Google	Facebook

Related Links
The Long War - Doctrine and Application

Memory Foam Mattress Review

SPACE MEDIA NETWORK PROMOTIONS Solar Energy Solutions Tempur-Pedic Mattress Comparison ... Newsletters :: SpaceDaily :: SpaceWar :: TerraDaily :: Energy Daily XML Feeds :: Space News :: Earth News :: War News :: Solar Energy News