. | . |
US spies elevate China rivalry to war of ideologies By Paul HANDLEY Washington (AFP) Feb 2, 2019 In a move that could harden Washington's posture toward Beijing for years, the US intelligence community has characterized relations with China as a global ideological showdown that will not be doused by trade deals or commercial theft crackdowns. US spy chiefs abruptly shifted their view of the superpower rivalry this week to something much deeper than a contest over markets, technology and geopolitics. The annual Worldwide Threat Assessment released by Director of National Intelligence Dan Coats instead said China is seeking to propagate "authoritarian capitalism" to counter Western liberal democracy, in an echo of the decades-long Cold War. "Chinese leaders will increasingly seek to assert China's model of authoritarian capitalism as an alternative -- and implicitly superior -- development path abroad, exacerbating great-power competition that could threaten international support for democracy, human rights, and the rule of law," it said. It added the "coming ideological battle" will be marked by "a period of increased Chinese foreign policy activism and a Chinese worldview that links China's domestic vision to its international vision," including the idea that market-oriented authoritarian regimes are superior. China policy analysts said the assessment marks an important modification of US thinking -- and reflects President Xi Jinping's ideological transformation of Chinese foreign policy. They also say it goes far beyond the views of Trump, who has treated relations with China as more transactional. - 'Ideological competition' - "This is more than just economics," said James McGregor, chairman of China business consultancy APCO Worldwide. "Now that China is so successful, there is an ideological battle for which system works best," he told AFP. "There are a lot of poor and developing countries which have looked at what China has accomplished with awe and admiration, and they are wondering if that system will work for them." Aaron Friedberg, Princeton University professor and China expert, said the shift is significant but not surprising after Xi last year severed the country's decades-old anchor to a non-ideological foreign policy. "For a long time Chinese officials went out of their way to say that they didn't see themselves as presenting an alternative model," he said. "Now it is an ideological competition because the Chinese see it that way." But Xi differs from Mao Zedong, the iconic leader who sought to advance his version of Marxism-Leninism throughout the developing world in the 1950s and 1960s, Friedberg said. Xi's government is, he explained, "doing things that have the effect of weakening democratic institutions in places where they are not perhaps deeply rooted," such as Central Europe and Africa. "In Africa and elsewhere their preferred partners are often authoritarian rulers, reducing the chances that those countries will have liberal political systems," he said. According to Tarun Chhabra of the Brookings Institution, the US intelligence community now believes China is deliberately attacking fundamental US values on the world stage. "Our values are inherently threatening to the Chinese Communist Party by virtue of our fundamental commitment to free speech," said Chhabra. "A commitment to the idea that the state doesn't have a monopoly on the truth is 'ideological' and profoundly dangerous for the CCP," he said. He cited two developments driving the decision to brand it an ideological battle. First is the interment of nearly a million Muslim Uighurs in western China in an effort to "stamp out" their identity, he said. That "really lays bare a fundamental clash between those who believe in upholding the individual dignity of all people, and those who justify virtually anything in the name of internal security." Second, Chhabra said, was Beijing's combining massive digital surveillance with a social credit apparatus, which could one day give the CCP social control "to a degree that Mao himself probably never dreamed about." - Message to Trump - US-China relations have deteriorated steadily over the past five years of Xi's determined projection of China's influence around the globe. Friedberg said the new stance by US spy chiefs was a message to Trump, who unlike previous presidents speaks little of liberal democratic values, and avoids seeing the Washington-Beijing relationship as a fundamental fight between models of governance. "I think that this statement by the Director of National Intelligence is drawing attention to something which the administration for various reasons has chosen to downplay. It's their interpretation of reality, that differs somewhat from the people at the top of the administration." "He seems to be oddly sympathetic to illiberal regimes," Friedberg said of Trump.
Air Force sends two B-52 bombers over East China Sea Washington (UPI) Jan 31, 2019 The U.S. Air Force flew two B-52 bombers over the East China Sea and Sea of Japan in what it described as a "routine training" amid trade tensions with China. Two nuclear-capable B-52H Stratofortress aircraft departed Andersen Air Force Base on the U.S. territory of Guam on Monday, U.S. Pacific Air Force spokeswoman Capt. Victoria Hight Aircraft told the Japan Times. Spots, a Twitter account tracking movements of military aircraft, showed that the exercise took the bombers over the East ... read more
|
|
The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2024 - Space Media Network. All websites are published in Australia and are solely subject to Australian law and governed by Fair Use principals for news reporting and research purposes. AFP, UPI and IANS news wire stories are copyright Agence France-Presse, United Press International and Indo-Asia News Service. ESA news reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. All articles labeled "by Staff Writers" include reports supplied to Space Media Network by industry news wires, PR agencies, corporate press officers and the like. Such articles are individually curated and edited by Space Media Network staff on the basis of the report's information value to our industry and professional readership. Advertising does not imply endorsement, agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by Space Media Network on any Web page published or hosted by Space Media Network. General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) Statement Our advertisers use various cookies and the like to deliver the best ad banner available at one time. All network advertising suppliers have GDPR policies (Legitimate Interest) that conform with EU regulations for data collection. By using our websites you consent to cookie based advertising. If you do not agree with this then you must stop using the websites from May 25, 2018. Privacy Statement. Additional information can be found here at About Us. |