 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| . |  |
. |
US to make no commitments to Iraq's defense: Gates
Washington (AFP) Feb 6, 2008 The United States will make no commitments to the defense of Iraq in a new status of forces agreement setting for the legal basis of the US military presence there, US Defense Secretary Robert Gates said Wednesday. Gates assured Democratic lawmakers that the agreement, which is to be negotiated with the Iraqi government, would not tie the hands of a future president. "The status of forces agreement that is being discussed will not contain a commitment to defend Iraq, and neither will any strategic framework agreement," he said. Gates said a "declaration of principles" signed by President George Bush and Iraqi President Nuri al-Maliki in November likewise was not "a security commitment to the Iraqis." "My view is that there ought to be a great deal of openness and transparence with Congress as we negotiate this status of forces agreement so that you can satisfy yourselves that those kinds of commitments are not being made, and that there are no suprises," he told the Senate Armed Services Committee. It was the clearest statement yet by a senior administration official on the limits of the status of forces agreement, which typically sets forth the legal basis for the US military's presence in another country. Gates had previously said that it would not provide for permanent bases in Iraq or establish US force levels. But other contradictory descriptions of the scope of the agreement by senior White House officials had fueled suspicions among Democrats that the administration was trying to circumvent Congress on what was essentially a treaty matter. President George W. Bush raised further questions by asserting that his administration would disregard a provision in a 2008 military spending bill that forbids the establishment of permanent bases in Iraq. "I suspect that language was more to do with constitutional issues, than with the substance of whether or not we want permanent bases in Iraq," Gates said. "The fact is that in every meeting I've taken part in it has been affirmed from the president on down that we do not want permanent bases in Iraq." The US military presence in Iraq is currently validated by a UN Security Council resolution which expires December 31. The status of forces agreement would replace it. Gates said it would be difficult to persuade Iraq to accept even a short extension of the UN resolution to allow a new US administration to negotiate the status of forces agreement. "They don't want permanent bases either. They are interested in asserting their sovereignty," he said. Community Email This Article Comment On This Article Related Links Iraq: The first technology war of the 21st century
Outside View: Ahmadinejad goes to Baghdad
Moscow (UPI) Feb 6, 2008 It is already clear the Iranian president's upcoming visit to Iraq will not be just a regional event. This is a visit by the leader of U.S. enemy No. 1 to the country that is practically controlled by the United States. |
|
|
| The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2007 - SpaceDaily.AFP and UPI Wire Stories are copyright Agence France-Presse and United Press International. ESA Portal Reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement,agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by SpaceDaily on any Web page published or hosted by SpaceDaily. Privacy Statement |
