. | . |
US tries to fix tanker mix-up with Boeing, EADS Washington (AFP) Dec 1, 2010 The US Air Force on Wednesday said it has tried to correct an embarrassing mix-up that sent the wrong data to aerospace rivals bidding on the lucrative contract for a new aerial refueling tanker. After having sent technical analyses to the wrong companies, the Air Force reportedly learned that one of the firms, EADS, had opened a computer file with information about the bid of its rival, Boeing. As a result, the Air Force decided to resend each company the other's information and allowed them to review it. "Air Force officials have analyzed the information that was actually accessed by one of the offerors and have taken steps to ensure that both competitors have equal access to this information," the Air Force said in a statement. The move was first reported by the New York Times on Wednesday, with an official saying forensic investigators that inspected computers from both companies concluded that an EADS worker had opened a file with details of how Boeing's proposal performed in a technical evaluation. The Air Force insisted it would ensure "a level playing field" in the hard-fought contest but Boeing expressed concern over the episode, leaving open the possibility of an eventual formal protest. The incident "is a concern for us," said Dennis Muilenburg, president and chief executive of Boeing Defense, Space & Security. "With these unanswered questions unresolved we are keeping our options open," Muilenburg said at a Credit Suisse defense and aerospace conference in New York. The chief executive of EADS North America, Sean O'Keefe, told reporters last week that his employees had not read files with data about Boeing's proposal. The documents related to an efficiency analysis of the competing aircraft, looking at how many tankers would be required to carry out a particular air refueling scenario. The mix-up threatens to derail the troubled and long-delayed tanker project, which has been marked by scandal, transatlantic political tensions and intense lobbying in Congress. The European Aeronautic Defence and Space Company (EADS), the parent company of France-based Airbus, and US giant Boeing are competing for the deal to replace 179 aerial refueling tankers in an aging Boeing-built fleet. In 2008, EADS in partnership with Northrop Grumman won the contract for the tankers, but the deal was canceled after a successful Boeing appeal to the investigative arm of Congress. Northrop has dropped out in the latest contest. Boeing won an earlier contract in 2003 but corruption allegations, which led to the conviction of a former Air Force official, forced the Pentagon to start the contest over again. US commanders see the planned KC-X aircraft as crucial to bolstering American air power and are anxious to replace the older Boeing KC-135 Stratotankers that date back to the 1950s. The Pentagon had promised earlier this year a decision in November or December, but the Air Force said it expects an award early next year.
Share This Article With Planet Earth
Related Links The Military Industrial Complex at SpaceWar.com Learn about the Superpowers of the 21st Century at SpaceWar.com
EADS confident A400M will be a success Frankfurt, Germany (UPI) Dec 1, 2010 European defense giant EADS is confident it can turn around its troubled Airbus A400 military transporter program by selling up to 500 of the planes. "We see a broad global market of 400 to 500 aircraft with good chances for this aircraft to turn profits in the long term," the company's Chief Finance Officer Hans-Peter Ring told the Germany-based Euro am Sonntag weekly. Ring adde ... read more |
|
The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2010 - SpaceDaily. AFP and UPI Wire Stories are copyright Agence France-Presse and United Press International. ESA Portal Reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement,agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by SpaceDaily on any Web page published or hosted by SpaceDaily. Privacy Statement |