. Military Space News .
US troop move may come without Afghan 'legitimacy': Gates

Pentagon announces planned Afghan troop rotations
The Pentagon announced Tuesday deployments of about 11,000 troops to Afghanistan next year and a squadron of MV-22 tilt-rotor aircraft leaving next month as part of already planned rotations. The deployments of three combat brigades in spring and fall of 2010 would replace departing units and not augment the approximately 68,000-strong force in Afghanistan, it said. But the MV-22 Osprey, an ungainly looking troop carrier that hovers and lands like a helicopter and flies like a plane, will be making its first appearance in Afghanistan after a tour in Iraq. "We are very confident in the capability of the MV-22s and what they bring to that theater," said Bryan Whitman, a Pentagon spokesman. He said they would be used in southern Afghanistan to support US forces fighting the Taliban insurgency, which has grown in strength and effectiveness. A dozen MV-22 aircraft were in Iraq for a year ending in May but were used to ferry troops, senior officers and cargo in areas where threat levels were low. A report by the Government Accountability Office, a congressional watchdog, found that the aircraft's superior speed and range were an advantage that "cut the battlefield in half" when compared to helicopters. But the novel aircraft's ability to maneuver defensively is limited, and it lacks a weapon to lay down suppressive fire while approaching landing zones, raising questions about its value in combat operations, the GAO said. It also experienced problems with its icing protection system, the audit found. "In areas where icing conditions are more likely to be experienced, such as in Afghanistan, this may threaten mission accomplishment," the report said. The latest troop deployment orders were part of a planned rotation of US forces in Afghanistan, not the result of ongoing deliberations over whether to increase overall US force levels. US commanders have requested 40,000 additional troops, but President Barack Obama has held off a decision amid an intense debate within the administration over future US strategy. Two of the units announced Tuesday - the 1st Brigade of the 101st Airborne Division and the 2nd Stryker Regiment from Vilseck, Germany - will arrive in Afghanistan in the spring of 2010 with 7,700 troops. The 2nd Brigade Combat Team of the Iowa National Guard's 34th Infantry division was put on alert for deployment in late 2010 with 3,500 troops.

Italian reinforcements to stay for Afghan run-off vote
Italian reinforcements sent to Afghanistan for the presidential election will stay for the November 7 run-off vote, the Italian defence minister said on Tuesday. Italy sent around 400 extra troops to Afghanistan to boost its presence in the country for the August 20 election. "The hope now is that the election process will be complete before the winter - a delay of about a month or month and a half," the ANSA news agency quoted Defence Minister Ignazio La Russa as saying. "This being the case, we will be able to keep our promise of bringing the reinforcements home before the end of the year, but they will stay until the end of the election process." With 3,250 soldiers, the Italian contingent is currently the sixth largest in the 100,000-strong international military force in Afghanistan.
by Staff Writers
Aboard A Us Military Aircraft (AFP) Oct 20, 2009
President Barack Obama may have to make a decision on whether to send more US troops to Afghanistan even if the "legitimacy" of the Afghan government remains in doubt, Defense Secretary Robert Gates said Tuesday.

Gates told reporters aboard his plane that a decision on strategy and troop levels might have to be taken before the outcome of disputed Afghan elections is fully resolved.

"My view is that whatever emerges in Kabul is going to be an evolutionary process," said Gates when asked about a possible run-off vote.

"The president will have to make his decisions in the context of that evolutionary process," he said.

Gates' comments appeared to diverge from White House chief of staff Rahm Emanuel, who suggested on Sunday that a troop decision would have to wait for a resolution of the disputed vote that could produce a "credible" government in Kabul.

The August presidential elections -- tainted by allegations of widespread fraud -- have caused serious concern in the Obama administration over the credibility of President Hamid Karzai's government and helped prompt a wide-ranging review of strategy.

Amid accusations of dithering from Republicans in Congress, Obama has been holding high-level meetings on the war in recent weeks and has held off making a decision on a request from the US commander in Afghanistan for tens of thousands additional forces.

Gates acknowledged the vote had "complicated" the situation in Afghanistan and it would take time for the political tensions to be settled.

The approach of winter meant the window for holding a run-off was closing fast, as snow would make it impossible for many Afghans to reach polling places, he said.

"I think the weather becomes a limiting factor in terms of the run-off," he said.

If there was a run-off in Afghanistan, Gates said he was confident the NATO-led force of more than 100,000 -- including nearly 68,000 American troops -- could provide security for the election along with Afghan security forces.

In the meantime, the United States and its allies would work to bolster the Kabul government's legitimacy and to stem corruption, he said.

"We are not just going to sit on our hands waiting for the outcome of this election and for the emergence of a government in Kabul.

"We have operations underway and we will continue to conduct those operations." he said.

In Kabul, a UN-backed watchdog overseeing Afghanistan's elections ordered votes from 210 polling stations thrown out Monday in a move that observers said deprived Karzai of an outright win.

The findings of the Electoral Complaints Commission (ECC) over the August 20 vote raised the prospect that Karzai could be forced into a second round or come under intense international pressure to stitch together a national unity government.

The Pentagon chief's press secretary, Geoff Morrell, said that Gates believed the Kabul government's legitimacy was not merely a matter of securing a clear outcome for the elections.

"For the secretary, the legitimacy question is beyond who's declared the victor in the elections," Morrell told reporters.

The question was "does this government, whoever's in charge, have the full faith and confidence of the Afghan people?"

Gates defended the pace of deliberations on Afghanistan and suggested Obama was moving closer to a decision.

"I think it's been a thorough process and I think we are now moving to the point where the president will begin to address specific options and then make his decision," he said.

With Secretary of State Hillary Clinton scheduled to travel next week and Gates on a tour of Asia this week, another round of White House strategy sessions on Afghanistan would have to wait until after next week, he said.

In Washington meanwhile Karzai's main election rival Abdullah Abdullah said he was open to either a run-off vote or other options to resolve Afghanistan's political paralysis.

The former foreign minister declined to elaborate on the other options amid speculation of a national unity government, after a UN-backed commission threw out more than one million fraudulent ballots from the August 20 election.

"While I am prepared to go for a run-off, at the same time the door is open," Abdullah, who accuses Karzai of rampant ballot fraud, told CNN.

Gates, who presided over a ceremony Monday in Hawaii for the new head of the US Pacific Command, was en route to Tokyo, where he will hold talks on Tuesday and Wednesday with the new government ahead of a visit next month by Obama.

The defense secretary was due in Seoul on Wednesday and Thursday before heading to Slovakia for a NATO summit on Friday expected to be dominated by the war in Afghanistan.

Gates, who in the past accused some European allies of falling short in their support for the Afghan mission, also said he was encouraged by the attitude of NATO members this year, saying they had shown a "renewed commitment" to the war effort.

Share This Article With Planet Earth
del.icio.usdel.icio.us DiggDigg RedditReddit
YahooMyWebYahooMyWeb GoogleGoogle FacebookFacebook



Related Links
News From Across The Stans



Memory Foam Mattress Review
Newsletters :: SpaceDaily :: SpaceWar :: TerraDaily :: Energy Daily
XML Feeds :: Space News :: Earth News :: War News :: Solar Energy News


US warns it needs credible Afghan partner
Washington (AFP) Oct 18, 2009
Top US officials Sunday delivered a sharp warning to Afghan leaders to resolve the election crisis, saying it would be irresponsible to send in more US troops without a strong government in place. "I think it would be irresponsible and... it would be reckless to make a decision on US troop level if, in fact, you haven't done a thorough analysis of whether in fact there's an Afghan partner ... read more







The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2009 - SpaceDaily. AFP and UPI Wire Stories are copyright Agence France-Presse and United Press International. ESA Portal Reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement,agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by SpaceDaily on any Web page published or hosted by SpaceDaily. Privacy Statement