Subscribe free to our newsletters via your
. Military Space News .




THE STANS
US weighs 10,000 troops in Afghanistan, or none
by Staff Writers
Washington (AFP) Jan 22, 2014


US military leaders have proposed keeping 10,000 troops in Afghanistan after NATO's combat mission ends in December -- or else pull out all American forces, a US official said Wednesday.

The official said that the commander of the NATO-led International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) in Afghanistan, General Joseph Dunford, presented the option last week to the White House, which is weighing the proposal.

"It's fair to say that the intelligence community, the State Department, the Pentagon, all believe that if we're going to have a footprint in Afghanistan after 2014, it should be about that number," said the official, referring to the 10,000 troop level.

"If that can't be, we also believe it would be most prudent to have nothing," the official told AFP, speaking on condition of anonymity.

The option being debated by the White House -- first reported by The Wall Street Journal and The New York Times -- also calls for a short stay for the proposed post-2014 force, which would be scaled back and withdrawn within two years, the official said.

Such a scenario would allow Obama to end the longest US war by the time he leaves office in January 2017.

But the move could prompt accusations of an irresponsible retreat after repeated vows by Washington to maintain an enduring presence in Afghanistan.

Any future force after December still hinges on Afghan President Hamid Karzai signing a bilateral security agreement between the two countries that lays out a legal framework for a US military presence beyond 2014. Karzai has so far refused to sign the deal.

The proposed security pact with Afghanistan would allow US troops to stay through 2024.

The White House acknowledged it was looking at options for a post-2014 force but would not comment on the choices laid out by the Pentagon.

"The president has not yet made decisions about final troop numbers and I'm not going to discuss the details of our ongoing deliberations," National Security Council spokeswoman Caitlin Hayden said in an email.

"We will be weighing inputs from our military commanders, as well as the intelligence community, our diplomats and development experts as we make decisions about our post-2014 presence in Afghanistan."

Hayden reiterated that Afghanistan needed to sign the security agreement or else the US government would have to start planning for a complete withdrawal of American and NATO troops from the country.

Under the Pentagon proposal, US commanders hope the 10,000 US troops would be joined by 2,000-3,000 forces from other NATO countries, according to the Journal.

Military commanders have reportedly told the White House that if Obama rejects the 10,000 troop option, then all American forces should be withdrawn as a smaller force would be unable to provide security for intelligence officers and diplomats.

Vice President Joe Biden, known for his long-running opposition to a large military presence in Afghanistan, is believed to favor a contingent of less than 10,000, comprised mainly of special operations forces.

But defense officials maintain that the elite special forces would be mostly ineffective without intelligence teams tracking militants to be targeted, according the Journal and the Times.

The discussions echo a 2009 debate on Afghanistan that pitted Biden and some White House officials against the Pentagon, which favored a surge of troops to break a stalemate with the Taliban insurgency.

The acrimony seriously strained relations between the White House and the military leadership, and a newly released memoir by former defense secretary Robert Gates has provided new details of the feud.

The troop figures put forward last week by the Pentagon are in line with numbers previously cited by top commanders nearly a year ago, in which they estimated an international force of about 8,000 to 12,000 -- most of them Americans -- after the end of 2014.

About 37,500 US troops are currently on the ground in Afghanistan, along with 19,000 forces from other countries in the NATO-led coalition.

The United States led an invasion of Afghanistan after the attacks of September 11, 2001, quickly toppling the Taliban regime because of its ties to the Al-Qaeda terror network.

In the years since, the US military, NATO and Afghan forces have waged a protracted campaign against the Taliban and associated insurgents, resulting in a stalemate.

.


Related Links
News From Across The Stans






Comment on this article via your Facebook, Yahoo, AOL, Hotmail login.

Share this article via these popular social media networks
del.icio.usdel.icio.us DiggDigg RedditReddit GoogleGoogle








THE STANS
Blast near Pakistan military HQ kills four: officials
Rawalpindi, Pakistan (AFP) Jan 20, 2014
A suspected suicide bombing in a market close to Pakistan's military headquarters on Monday killed at least four people, officials said, a day after one of the deadliest attacks on security forces in recent years. Police and military officials said Monday's attack near the heavily fortified complex in Rawalpindi, Islamabad's twin city, may have involved a suicide bomber. It came a day af ... read more


THE STANS
Raytheon resumes work on US Navy Air and Missile Defense Radar

Israel's Rafael and Raytheon to co-produce Iron Dome

Lockheed Martin Advances Affordability Across U.S. Navy's Aegis Weapons System To Secure Multi-Year Contract

Boeing and Israel Aerospace Industries' Arrow 3 Interceptor Completes Second Flight Test

THE STANS
Raytheon receives SM-3 contract

Iran mulls replacement for Russian S-300 missile system

Lockheed Martin Receives Contracts for JASSM Production

Israel successfully tests Arrow space missile interceptor

THE STANS
McCain fury over 'secret' Congress move on drones

Hunter Unmanned Aircraft System Surpasses 100,000 Combat Flight Hours

Northrop Grumman's Global Hawk Boasts Best Safety Record Designation

Global Hawk Aids in Philippine Relief Efforts

THE STANS
Boeing Transmits Protected Government Signal Through Military Satellite

Fifth MUOS Completes Assembly, Enters System Test

Northrop Grumman Supports US Marine Corps Command, Control and Communications Facility for Tactical Air Operations

Rocket Rokot brings 3 Russian military-purpose satellites on orbit

THE STANS
The right stuffing: Turkeys enlisted in terror fight

US Navy Awards Lockheed Martin Contract for Production of Paveway II

US probes Honeywell over sensor made in China

Kongsberg to upgrade Australia's Protector stations

THE STANS
More defense cuts seen likely as Canada tightens its budget belt

Riyadh's $3B arms aid for Lebanon boosts French defense sales

Africa grows in importance for defense companies

Israel, Singapore seek FMS deals

THE STANS
China plans new patrol in disputed South China Sea: media

China leaders' kin stash riches in offshore tax havens: probe

Japan tells world to stand up to China or face consequences

Relocation of Marine's Okinawa base will go ahead

THE STANS
Imec Celebrates 30 Years of Nanoelectronics Industry Innovation

Extraordinary sensors pushed to their boundaries

Understanding secondary light emissions by plasmonic nanostructures

No nano-dust danger from facade paint




The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2014 - Space Media Network. AFP, UPI and IANS news wire stories are copyright Agence France-Presse, United Press International and Indo-Asia News Service. ESA Portal Reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement,agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by Space Media Network on any Web page published or hosted by Space Media Network. Privacy Statement